Non Ideas in current so called Bio Ethics & Life itself (bio-logy)

"There are 36000 life scientists, but they are actually death scientists." Robert F. Kennedy Jr.  

 

Basic insufficiencies in current bio ethics

The subject of bio ethics has haphazardly emerged as reaction to prolongations of technical intervention capacities and exploration wills since recent times, especially in biology i.e. bio technology and engineering, AI, bio medicine, human ecology, bio politics and bio economics.

So far it stays a reaction to an action.

Not only that every bio ethical approach is a bio-logically insufficient and estranged, external (moralistic) approach, it refers to models of Life not sufficient and not adequate of that which is disclosed within those practices (bio sciences).

So long, we can say, there is no bio ethics existing so far and there is no adequate question for LIFE existing so far. We are dealing with and floating within ephemerics not being able to capture our own actions, purposes and abilities.

Bio ethics - How to behave

Bio ethics however fully depends on the revelation of a fully revealed notion and entity of Life it self. Life itself is bio-logy. It is within this irreducible notion and entity bio-logy acts. Biology is the operation of this entity. This is a full redundance. If it counts as empty or formal redundance it acts as non-bio-logy. Non life. And non science of life. Life science is primal conscienceness of this primarity. Evidence no step above and behind. Evidence in this case does not mean and is fully misinterpreted as immediate total disclosure. It persists as performance of concealation/revelation (Verborgenheit/Unverborgenheit) of a-letheia. The more the a-letheia of bio-logy is performed by revelation of its intermediants the more it perfects the aleteia, which may be seen as total revelation or self-understanding and self-realisation that is it-realisation, life-realisation.
Bio ethics within bio-logy is therefore performing how to behave within bio-logy, i.e. how to behave within life.

So how do we behave within executing basic operations within/on our life?

The first layer then is (a.) that we behave within/at our life. (b.) to which purpose we behave by operating, (c.) with which means to which purpose we behave and operate respective to (a.).

Bio ethics and  non objective life/bio-logy

Current bio science and by it bio ethics starts with an already selective and reductive approach to life. It stays totally limited within the objectivity frame to life. However it is not possible to fully objectively constrain the own life. This is a hypothesis not real. It defines a decision of approach and means: "I will act as if it is valid that I can fully separate my life from my life and I will forget this discretion." (I) It is only valid within the transcendental analysis of vividness itself. It is and stays therefore an transcendental act it self. It means: "I will act respectively as being free (even fully free) to instrumentalize my life." (II) This however does not eliminate or even hide the reflective, transcendental and finally objectively real relation to it, i.e. this discretion. The step (II) does not get eliminated within the execution of (I). This irreducibly combined operation acts therefore irreducibly within: "I am the permanent concealed/revealed performance of (I) with (II)."
This stays the more valid the more basic the intervention to the bio-logical phenomenon is.
This operation and distinction is irreducible within vivid, i.e. bio-logical inter-action itself.
It provides therefore the basis of all bio ethical operation, action and i.e. judgement (Urteil).

Laboratory of lives

Within our practice (ta pragmata, ta noemata) we have entered a sphere of micro-bio-logical discrimination. Within the holistic combinatory field of technical capacity, will and interest bio engineering (Lebensbildung, bio formativity) displays matters of fundamental operational and interventional material progress, constituting however no qualitative advancement in the scope of interference not known to humans or any other acting bio-logical capacity and entity.
The above (a.), (b.), (c.) triad does not get neither sur nor under passed.
The bio material and bio technology proliferate, but the bio - logy concentrates.
The Conscienceness of acting within the life, the one of the means and purposes and that of the primal purpose of life as it self increases.
Public discretion and discussion increases too.
Are the purposes, is the execution of operations and measures desirable?
Does all of these performances suffice to the overall desirable presentation of our life, the Life itself, and whom is the ownership distributed and granted to? Can life general be private and what is the publicity of life, the community of bio logics? Can general life be private?